Jump to content

jennasoft

Commercial Member
  • Content count

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jennasoft

  1. And JennaSoft second project is...

    and a few more... of course work in progress(no transparency nor reflexion added at this time) :
  2. Hi guys, it has been a long time since we made some major announcement here. We're proud to announce our current Project for FSX and P3D v3 and v4 : Gatwick! The following screenshots were taken on P3D version, with a native P3D ground. Stayed tuned! O. Badiambila JennaSoft
  3. And JennaSoft second project is...

    Hi All, no release date, so far... just a screen :
  4. LFLL P3D V4

    Hi all, Yes, we are looking on a way to first make and release an updated FSX and P3Dv4 compatible ground for free, as many of you have been waiting for it for a long time. A new version with the new terminal and some new features on the old buildings, would then be released one year later, this time with an extra cost for old customers.
  5. LFLL P3D V4

    Hi, yes, it will take months. I would say more than a year. Let be realistic. The new Terminal(called Terminal 1 Hall B ) has already opened but will be fully functionnal only on Summer 2018. At the best, we could expect that all jetways are in position on Spring 2018. From there, we'll have to wait months before a good satelite imagery is available. Keep in mind we don't only need the first one available, but one without too many clouds, good colors, and so on... Once the new ground made(1-2 months), there are two options : - just modelling the new Hall B and a 2 or 3 others small new buildings, and using the all already made. It could save time but some people may complain that some textures should have been refreshed. - or retexturing all buildings already made with the actual texturing techniques...but adding some months again to the developpment. As always in Flight Simulation, everything is about making compromises.
  6. And JennaSoft second project is...

    Hi F737NG, We would be happy to announce a release for Januar but we cannot promise anything because a scenery developpment is a long way, with unexpected bugs to fix all along. But we'll continue to post some screenshots here so that you can follow the works progression.
  7. And JennaSoft second project is...

    Thanks Windshear. Unfortunately, we don't intend to do any version of LHR. Gatwick is already a pretty big piece for us, and we have to focus on it, before thinking about the next project. Heathrow is really huge, and there is no doubt that a major developper will put it on his list, soon or later.
  8. New Runway Numbers 35/17

    Hi all, the answer remains the same. We still wait that the completion of the work in the real airport. We'll make also a P3D version.
  9. LFLL P3D V4

    Hi, the actual version will not be compatibe but Lyon v2.0 will be for FSX and P3D v4 and we'll find a way to make this update an acceptable price for owners of version 1.0/1.1. We are waiting for the new terminal to be completed. We also have to wait for a good available satelite imagery.
  10. New Runway Numbers 35/17

    Hello, sorry for the very late answer...the add on is not abandonned, at least for FSX. There won't be any development for the fs9 version in the future, regarding the inclusion of some new taxiways when it was released several years ago and the decreasing market for fs9. But I wish to develop a new version for FSX(and maybe P3D), including the new taxiways with the right numbering, and the new extension of terminal 1. I could have made only the new taxiways currently in service, but it requires to start the groundwork from scratch and I would have then to do it again, once the new terminal opened. So I prefer to wait until the opening of the terminal before launching the project. And furthermore, this all stuff requires a new ground imagery, that is not yet available, as the new building is not build. Some of the old buildings may also be reworked. Because it means several months of works, probably one year, it cannot be considered as a single update and the scenery will be released as a new one. Be sure that I will discuss with Simmarket, to provide a good offer for LFLL old customers, so that the price for them doesn't exceed 10 eur.
  11. [FSX] LFLL batiments non visibles

    Bonjour, Je ne vois que deux situations possibles à ma connaissance pour des bâtiments non visibles dans FSX. Soit il y a absence des textures de batiments dans le répertoire texture...(dans fs9, cela donnerait des bâtiments grisés mais dans FSX, il disparaissent si il manque ne serait-ce que les textures de nuit, même lorsque les textures de jour sont présentes). Soit il manque le bgl contenant la librairie de bâtiments ou le bgl de placement des bâtiments(ces deux .bgl se nomment LFLL_batlib.bgl et LFLL_bat_plac.bgl) Cela paraît quand même difficilement concevable si vous avez installé la scène avec l'installeur officiel... A moins que vous n'utilisiez pas FSX mais une variante(Steam? P3D?) O.Badiambila JennaSoft
  12. AES compatibility available soon

    Hi everybody, I get from O. Pabst himself that Lyon Saint-Exupery Airport FSX will be AES compatible, approximatively within one month. And it should be the same for the later FS9 version.
  13. AES compatibility available soon

    Hi, sorry for the late answer...I was in contact with Oliver when Lyon X was released and after adaptating AES to Lyon, he asked me to tell him when Lyon fs9 would be ready. But I forgot to send him an email for fs9 release... I think you'll be glad to hear that an order of Lyon fs9 was made from him on 27 october 2014... We have now to wait because he may not give a release date.
  14. multiples problèmes LFLL // Severals problem LFLL

    Bonjour, le plantage, lorsqu'il est lié à un doublon d'afcad, ne génère pas de message d'erreur de type "mémoire insuffisante". Je suppose que vous parlez du fichier scenery.cfg. et non du répertoire "scenery" situé dans le dossier traffic de fs9? En tout cas, il faut penser à regarder dans les deux car un afcad peut être lu en doublon par fs lorsqu'il est lu dans le repertoire Microsoft Games/Flight Simulator9/traffic/scenery de FS9 sans que vous ayez forcémment une scène déclarée de Lyon dans scenery.cfg. Par exemple, si vous avez installé des package d'afcad pour les aéroports par défaut.
  15. Hi all, some parking positions for Jennasoft Lyon fs9 have been corrected. The update is available here : http://www.iflysimx.com/files/file/109-lfll-fs9-parking-positions-update/ Olivier Badiambila JennaSoft
  16. Hi all, Second update(version 1.2) for the parking assignment available at the same place(just click the link above). O.Badiambila.
  17. [FS9] Lyon St-Ex AFCAD problem

    Bonjour, correction des places de parking de la jetée, de l'aire cargo, du terminal low coast avec la version 1.2 dispo sur la même page. Difficile de corriger les positions T1 et T2 puisqu'on ne peut pas prévoir le modèle d'avion qui vient au contact de la passerelle...
  18. LFLL Mesh problem

    Hi gordonhutchison, as far as I can see on your pics, that may not be considered as an issue. In the reality, the motorway and the railway are not at the same level than the airport, the mesh is just more slopped with a smoother transition. We have to admit that our mesh is not very accurate but this difference seems to be increased in P3D...
  19. multiples problèmes LFLL // Severals problem LFLL

    Bonjour, les plantages de fs9 à l'approche d'une piste(le plus souvent donc à l'atterrissage mais aussi au décollage) sont en général lié à un doublon d'afcad. Vérifiez que vous n'avez pas un afcad LFLL "activé" autrefois pour une autre scène ou pour la scène par défaut(dans le répertoire scenery du dossier roots de FS9). Concernant le positionnement des avions, un update a été mis en téléchargement dans cette rubrique support(voir afcad updated). Aux dernières nouvelles, il reste bien quelques positions à corriger, je vais reprendre çà dans les jours à venir... Quant à l'attribution des portes aux compagnies, il me manque un document référence pour savoir avec précision "quelle compagnie dessert quel terminal". Je crois que je m'étais basé sur le site de l'aéroport de Lyon et mes souvenirs(je connais un peu l'aéroport) mais il peut y avoir des imprécisions. Certaines compagnies, notamment au T3, peuvent ne pas être visibles si vous n'avez pas installé le traffic ai qui leur est spécifique. Les portes sont bien annotées pour Easy Jet et Transavia, par exemple... Enfin, un avion ai ne stationne sur une porte "programmée" dans le fichier afcad pour sa compagnie que si le code compagnie figure dans le fichier aircraft.cfg de l'appareil, dans le cas contraire, il se positionne au hasard sur n'importe quelle porte, qu'elle soit annotée ou pas...
  20. [FS9] Lyon St-Ex AFCAD problem

    Bonjour Cimber, je vois effectivement sur votre screen que le résultats n'est pas concluant en ce qui concerne le positionnement de chaque appareil sur cette zone cargo....je vais modifier çà mais j'ai besoin de savoir : y-a t-il d'autre zones ou cela se produit ou n'avez vous constaté d'anomalie que pour la zone cargo? En ce qui concerne l'attribution des compagnies(je devine ici des avions hop sur des places réservé au fret), je précise qu'au delà d'erreurs éventuelles de ma part, les avions ai ne se parquent au bon terminal que si les modèles ai ont eux même une compagnie mentionnée dans leur fichier aircraft.cfg.
  21. Hi all, here are some screenshots of the soon coming fs9 version for LFLL. Some new taxiways have been added.
  22. [FS9] Lyon St-Ex AFCAD problem

    Bonjour Cimber, une mise à jour pour l'afcad de JennaSoft Lyon version fs9 est disponible ici : http://www.iflysimx.com/files/file/109-lfll-fs9-parking-positions-update/ Faites moi savoir si vous souhaitez faire corriger certaines positions.
  23. LFLL FS9 parking positions update

    Version 1.2

    92 downloads

    Fixes aircrafts parking position for JennaSoft Lyon Saint Exupéry. Just unzip the archive, copy the file  to the scenery folder. andaccept overwriting
  24. [FS9] Lyon St-Ex AFCAD problem

    Bonjour Cimber, mille excuse pour le retard. Je vous avais dit effectivement que l'afcad modifié serait disponible sous 15 jours. Je n'ai pu le transmettre après avoir perdu internet pour cause de déménagement. Je m'en occupe ce soir. Je vais tâcher de vous le faire parvenir ce week-end.
  25. Ugly Taxiway at LFLL

    Hi, there is no doubt that the new taxiways were not made the same way than the others. When FSX version developpment was launched, there were no aerial photo source for those taxiways. They were even not build. You must keep in mind that developping a scenery, I mean with a single developper, not a team, requires months, sometimes one complete year, from the pics on place to the modelling, texturing, placing. Then, it was not possible to include the new taxiways and anyway, not possible with a photoreal quality. If I could have release the fs9 version, on month after the fsx one, as I planned, I wouldn't have tried to make a rendition of the new taxiways. But several months were needed, as FSX and FS9 requires different developpment technics. And many FSX customers asked for an update of the taxiways. It was then logical to make it first with the fs9 version, but once again, without the same imagery quality. Only from aerial photos, taken from far. Improving the tarmac texture for new taxiways is possible(not soon). But don't expect a new developping from satelite or orthophoto when they'll be available. It's not possible to make an update each time the airport changes or I would have to make it every six months until 2020... Olivier Badiambila JennaSoft
×