here are my last words and I shut up too, I promise. 😉
customers(and I'm one, for some FS products), estimate the expected price from the quality, developers, from the time they spent on developping and the money they spent(sleeping at Arora hotel is a great but expensive souvenir😁). I assume the good compromise is at the crossing point between quality and time curves...
As I said for VGDS, after seing the preview screenshots from SODE, we put "adding SODE VGDS" in our "to do as update" list but after fast 2 years of work on Gatwick(including taking photos there and documentation), we wouldn't have wait 6 months more to release the scenery. Look on fsdevelopper.com and you'll see how many project are given up when the developpment last over one year...
Considering the lights, every scenery is a rendition, not the real airport. Releasing a scenery with centerline lights or blue edge lights everywhere would have exposed us to comments like "there is not so many lights".
We don't have a map showing the exact position of each light. We have to "guess" from charts or from photos, or videos...If you have such information, I take it without hesitation.
That said, we will add VGDS in the next update(1.2). but be sure somebody else will say "too expensive, animation are missing, new Boeing hangar missing, there are to kind of VGDS and you didn't take it in account" 🙃
(I had already announced myself somewhere in this forum that VGDS would come in 1.2 and I think that's where you read it)
Note that there is no date about 1.2
And by the way, I invite anybody who has got information about Boeing Hangar or VGDS positionning to contact us on firstname.lastname@example.org.